The precarious and circumstancial legal status of the state as the foremost subject of the international normative order

Authors

  • Pedro Ivo Ribeiro Diniz Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA
  • Leonardo Nemer Caldeira Brant Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17808/des.56.940

Keywords:

international law, state, sovereignty

Abstract

The State is a cardinal and structural element of international law. The international normative order derives, fundamentally, from inter-state dynamics. At the same time, international law carries the pretension of defining its legal status. There are countless criticisms and divergences, however, when concrete efforts are directed toward determining parameters for the characterization of the State status and what are the objective legal ramifications of that condition. The analysis of the theme under the prism of International Law - through vague (and often conflicting) theoretical propositions; the superficial manifestations of jurisprudence; the scarcity and ineffectiveness of normative instruments; and the contingent political constructions - corroborates the argument that statehood still appears as a general legal status whose determination is less technical-legal than circumstantial.

Author Biographies

Pedro Ivo Ribeiro Diniz, Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA

Departamento de Direito; Direito Internacional e Direitos Humanos.

Leonardo Nemer Caldeira Brant, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG

Departamento de Direito Público; Direito Internacional.

References

BARROS, Marinana Andrade e; BRANT, Leonardo Nemer Caldeira (Coord.). A Atuação Internacional dos Governos Subnacionais. Belo Horizonte: Editora Del Rey, 2010.

BRANT, Leonardo Nemer C. A Corte Internacional de Justiça e a Construção do Direito Internacional. Belo Horizonte, MG: ed. CEDIN, 2005.

BROWNLIE, Ian. Principles of Public International Law. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

BYERS, Michael (ed.). The Role of Law in International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

CASSESE, Antonio. International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

CARRILLO-SALCEDO, Juan-Antonio. Droit international et souveraineté des états : cours général de droit international public. Recueil des cours, v. 257, 1996.

CRAWFORD, James. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

DALLARI, D. de A. Elementos de teoria geral do Estado. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2010.

DIHN, Nguyen Quoc; DAILLIER, Patrick; PELLET, Alain. Direito Internacional Público. 2ª ed. Braga: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2003.

DINIZ, Arthur José de A. Direito Internacional: Nova Ordem ou velho Caos? In.: BRANT, Leonardo Nemer C (coord.). O Brasil e os Novos Desafios do Direito Internacional. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Editora Forense, 2004.

DUMBERRY, Patrick. State Succession to International Responsibility. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007.

DUURSMA, Jorri. Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-States: Self-determination and Statehood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

DWORKIN, Ronald. A New Philosophy for International Law. Philosophy and Public Affais, v. 41, n. 1, p. 2-30, 2013.

EDWARDS, Alice. The meaning of nationality in international law in an era of human rights: procedural and substantive aspects. In: EDWARDS, Alice; VAN WAAS, Laura. Nationality and Statelessness under International Law. Cambride: Cambrige University Press, 2014.

FASSBENDER, Bardo. Art. 2 (1). In: SIMMA, Bruno; KHAN; Daniel-Erasmus; NOLTE, George; PAULUS, Andreas. The Charter of The United Nations: A Commentary. 3. ed. v. 1. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012.

GORDON, Neve; PERUGINI, Nicola. The Human Rights to Dominate. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

GOWLLAND-DEBBAS, Vera. International Law and the quest for its implementation. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.

GRANT, Tom. How to recognise a State (and not): some practical considerations. In: BAETENS, Freye; CHINKIN, Christine. Sovereignty, statehood and state responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

HAFNER, Gerhard; KOHEN, G. Marcelo; BREAU, Susan. State Practice Regarding State Immunities. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.

KAMTO, Maurice. La volonté de l'état en droit international. Receuil des cours, v. 310, 2004.

KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. From Apology to Utopia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. What Use for Sovereignty Today?. Asian Journal of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, v. 1, p. 61-70, 2011.

KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. What is International Law for? In.: EVANS, Malcolm D. International Law. Oxford: University Press, 2003.

KRASNER, Stephen D. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1999.

KRATOCHWIL, Friedrich V., How do Norms Matter? In.: BYERS, Michael (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics, Oxford University Press, 2000.

KRITSCH, R. Soberania: a construção de um conceito. São Paulo: IMESP, 2002.

LESSA, Antônio Carlos. A construção da Europa: A última utopia das Relações Internacionais. Brasília: IBRI, 2003.

MANSELL, John N.K.. Flag State Responsibility: Historical Development and Contemporary Issues. New York: Springer, 2009.

MARTIN, Lisa L. Interests, Power and Multilateralism. International Organization, v. 46, n.4, p. 765-792, 1992.

MCWHINNEY, Edward. Self-Determination of Peoples and Plural-Ethnic States: Scession and State Succession and the Alternative, Federal Option. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002.

MELLO, Celso Duvivier de Albuquerque. A soberania através da História. In: MELLO, Celso Duvivier de Albuquerque. Anuário: direito e globalização: a soberania. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 1999.

MILNER, Helen V. Why Multilateralism? Foreign aid and domestic principal-agent problems. In HAWKINS, Darren, et al. (eds), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

PELLET , Alain, Le droit internationel entre souveraineté et communauté internationale. Anuário Brasileiro de Direito Internacional, vol.1. Belo Horizonte: CEDIN, 2006.

PELLET, Alain. As Novas Tendências do Direito Internacional: Aspectos "Macrojurídicos". In.: BRANT, Leonardo Nemer C (coord.). O Brasil e os Novos Desafios do Direito Internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2004.

PEREIRA, Antônio Celso A. Soberania e Pós Modernidade. In.: BRANT, Leonardo Nemer C (coord.). O Brasil e os Novos Desafios do Direito Internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2004.

PUTNAM, Robert R. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, v. 42, p. 427-460, 1988.

REZEK, Francisco. Direito Internacional Público. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2014.

RONEN, Yael. Entities that can be state but no claim to be. In FRENCH, Duncan. Statehood and Self-Determination: reconciling tradition and modernity in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

ROSENAU, James, Governance in a New Global Order, 2002; In.: HELD, David, and McGREW, Anthony (eds.) Governing Globalization, London: Polity Press, 2002.

SCOBBIE, Iain. The Invocation of Responsibility for the Brach of 'Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law'. The European Journal of International Law, v. 13, n. 5, p. 1201-1220, 2002.

SEITENFUS, Ricardo. Ingerência ou Solidariedade? : dilemas da ordem internacional contemporânea. São Paulo em Perspectiva. São Paulo, v. 16, n. 2, p. 12-26, 2002.

SHAW, Malcolm. Direito Internacional. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2010.

SIMMA, Bruno; KHAN; Daniel-Erasmus; NOLTE, George; PAULUS, Andreas. The Charter of The United Nations: A Commentary. 3. ed. v. 1. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012.

SIMPSON, Gerry. Great Powers and Outlaw States. Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law, v. 6, p.503-538, 1995.

SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. Nationalism versus internationalism: another look. New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, v. 26, p. 585- 588, 1994.

STEINBERG, Richard H.; ZASLOFF, Jonathan. Centennial Essay: Power and International Law. American Journal of International Law, American Society of International Law, v. 100, p.64- 92, Jan. 2006.

STILZ, Anna. Collective Responsibility and the State. The Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 19, n. 2, p. 190-208, 2011.

STRANGE, Susan. The retreat of the state : the diffusion of power in the world economy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

TOMUSCHAT, Christian; THOUVENIN, Jean-Marc (eds.). The Fundamental rules of the international legal order. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.

TUSSIE, Diana; RIGGIROZZI, Maria P. Novos Procedimentos e Velhos Mecanismos: a governança global e a sociedade civil. In: ESTEVES, Paulo L. (organizador). Instituições Internacionais: segurança, comércio e integração. Belo Horizonte: PUCMinas, 2003.

TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto Cançado. Direito das Organizações Internacionais. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2014.

TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto Cançado. Towards a new Jus Gentium: General Course on Public International Law. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.

WARBRICK, Colin. States and Recognition in International Law. In: EVANS, Malcolm D. International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

WENDT, Alexander. Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, v. 46, p. 391-425, 1992.

WOLFRUM, Rudiger, ROBEN Wolker, (eds.) Legitimacy in International Law. Berlin: Spring, 2008.

Published

2020-06-22

How to Cite

Diniz, P. I. R., & Brant, L. N. C. (2020). The precarious and circumstancial legal status of the state as the foremost subject of the international normative order. Revista Direito, Estado E Sociedade, (56). https://doi.org/10.17808/des.56.940

Issue

Section

Articles (Artigos)