The Contradictory Relationship between Free Market and Human Development: Possible Solutions from the Concept of Capabilities in Amartya Sen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17808/des.49.695Keywords:
Free Market, Human development, Economic calculations, Amartya Sen, Capabilities.Abstract
This article aims to address the issue of relationship between free markets and human development, especially in view of the possibilities of such consistent mechanisms, emphasizing the thought of Amartya Sen. The methodology is descriptive-analytic and qualitative. Therefore, it starts with an analysis of the free market, including its concept and practical implications, as well as its vision based on the perspective of development, stressing the responsibility of the market to promote economic development. It demonstrates that the free market is the possibility for the people to make trade freely, without State interference. It is noted that such State interference in the economy often hinders development, because market participants have more expertise to carry out the economic calculations. After, criticism of the free market will be studied, especially their inability to combat social ills alone, especially unemployment, hunger, poverty and other deprivation which people go through. Address the need for consistent free-market and economic growth with human development, provided the human agents involved in the development process participation in economic gains, reversing them in social achievements. Within this perspective, Amartya Sen's analysis of this relationship will be presented, linking the two ends through the concept of capabilities. Finally, the paper will evaluate, by means of the work of the aforementioned author, if the free market is the best means of economic development, concluding that, without the conjunction of State action, the market fails to solve all the problems of the economy. The need for a perspective that can connect free market and human development through the analysis of human capabilities is emphasized.References
ARISTÓTELES. Política. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 1985. Tradução de Mario da Gama Kury.
_____. Ética à Nicômaco. São Paulo: EDIPRO, 2014.
CANOTILHO, J. J. Gomes. Direito Constitucional e Teoria da Constituição. 5. ed. Coimbra: Almedina, 2002. p. 477.
F.A., Hayek. O caminho da servidão. São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2010.
_____. Desestatização do dinheiro. São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2011. Tradução de Heloísa Gonçalves Barbosa.
_____. Direito,Legislação e Liberdade: Uma nova formulação dos princípios liberais de Justiça e Economia Política. São Paulo: Editora Visão, 1985.
MENDONÇA, Luiz Jorge V. Pessoa de. Políticas sociais e luta de classes: uma crítica a Amartya Sen. Textos & Contextos, Porto Alegre, v. II, n. 1, p.65-73, jul. 2012.
NUNES, Antônio Avelãs. A Europa neoliberal e a crise atual do capitalismo. Prima Facie, João Pessoa, v. 11, n. 21, p. 143-182, dez. 2012.
_____, Antônio Avelãs. O keynesianismo e a contra-revolução monetarista. Coimbra: Almedina, 1991.
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Lasmujeres y eldesarrollo humano: el enfoque de las capacidades. Barcelona: Herder, 2002.
SEN, Amartya. A ideia de justiça. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2011.
_____. Desenvolvimento como liberdade. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2010.
_____.Desigualdade reexaminada. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2001.
_____. Sobre ética e economia. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1999.
SCRUTON, Roger. As vantagens do péssimo e o perigo da falsa esperança. São Paulo: É Realizações, 2015.
TODOROV, Tzvetan. Os inimigos íntimos da democracia. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2012. Tradução de Joana Angélica D'avila Melo.
VON MISES, Ludwig. Ação Humana. São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2010.
_____. As seis lições. São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2009. Tradução de Maria Luiza Borges.
_____. Uma crítica ao intervencionismo. São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2010. Tradução de Arlette Franco.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The submission of articles for publication in the Law, State, and Society Journal(Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade) implies the agreement of the authors with the following terms:
1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in an issue of the journal;
2. The author(s) assure that the submitted text is original and unpublished and that it is not under evaluation process in other journals;
3. The author(s) assume full responsibility for the opinions, ideas, and concepts sustained in the texts;
4. The author(s) grant the editors the right to make textual adjustments and adjustments to the journal's publication standards;
5. Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed, as long as the source is explicitly cited.