International Legal Compliance in the context of Internationalization of Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17808/des.54.506Keywords:
Internationalization of law, effectiveness of international law, international legal complianceAbstract
The purpose of this article is to assert the international legal compliance of the norms and decisions in the environment of the internationalization of law. Initially, discusses the reciprocal influences between the legal system and other social systems in a global governance landscape. Next, investigates the effectiveness of legal norms arising from these changes of society and international law. Forward, focuses on the traditional mechanisms of enforcement of international law and the new mechanisms used in the pursuit of effectiveness of international norms, in order to un-derstand the role of international courts, the incorporation of international norms to domestic political and legal structures and finally, the political, economic and reputational incentives as tools of legal enforcement in the context of the internalionalization of law. Thus, from the interdisciplinarity between Law and International Relations, as a research method, we seek to investigate the coercive and non-coercive elements that determine the effectiveness of this new international law.
References
ALTER, Karen J. Delegating to international courts: self-binding vs. other-binding delegation. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 71, p. 37 - 76. 2008.
______. Resolving or exacerbating disputes? the WTO's new dispute resolution system. International Affairs, v. 79, n. 4, p. 783 - 800. 2003.
BAHDI, R. Globalization of judgment: transjudicialism, international human rights law and commonwealth courts. 2001. 170 f. Thesis for degree of LL.M. Graduate Departament of Law of the University of Toronto, Toronto.
BERKOWITZ, Daniel; PISTOR, Katharina; RICHARD, Jean-Francois. Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. William Davidson Working Paper Number 410, p. 01 - 29. 2001
BOBBIO, N. Dalla struttura alla funzione: nuovi studi di teoria del diritto. Milan: Comunita, 1977.
BRADLEY, Curtis A.; KELLEY, Judith. The concept of international delegation. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 71, n. 1, p. 01 - 36. 2008.
DELMAS-MARTY, M. Les forces imaginantes du droit: le relatif et l'universel. Paris: Seuil, 2003, v. I.
ELIAS, Fernando Lopes Ferraz. A internacionalização do direito a partir de diferentes fenômenos privados de construção normativa. Revista de Direito Internacional, v. 11, n. 1, p. 116 - 133. 2014.
FISCHER-LESCANO, A.; TEUBNER, G. Regime collisions: the vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 25, p. 999 - 1046. 2003 - 2004.
GUZMAN, Andrew T. International tribunals: a rational choice analysis. University of
Pennsylvania Law Review, v. 157, n. 1, p. 171 - 235. 2008.
HATHAWAY, Oona A.; SHAPIRO, S. J. Outcasting: enforcement in domestic and international law. The Yale Law Journal, v. 121, p. 252 - 349. 2011.
HELFER, Laurence R.; SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication. Yale Law Journal, v. 107, n. 2, p. 273 - 392. 1997.
______; _____. Why states create international tribunals: a response to professors Posner and Yoo. California Law Review, v. 93, n. 1, p. 899 - 956. 2005.
JACKSON, John H. The jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: insights on treaty and economics relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 497 p.
KELSEN, Hans. Les rapports de système entre le droit interne et le droit international public. Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, v. 14, p. 227 - 331, 1926.
______. Peace through law. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, 2008. 155 p.
KOH, Harold Hongju. Jefferson memorial lecture: transnational legal process after september 11th. Berkeley Journal of International Law, v. 22, n. 3, p. 337 - 354. 2004.
______. The 1998 frankel lecture: bringing international law home. Houston Law Review, v. 35, n. 3, p. 623 - 682. 1998.
______. Transnational legal process. Nebraska Law Review, v. 75, p. 181 - 207. 1996.
KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. From apology to utopia: the structure of international legal argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2005. 683 p.
______. The politics of international law: twenty years later. European Journal of International Law, v. 20, n. 1, p. 07 - 19, 2009.
KRETZMER, David. Rethinking application of IHL in non-international armed conflit. Israel Law Review, v. 42, n. 1, p. 08 - 45, 2009.
LUHMANN, N. Sociología del riesgo. Trad. Silvia Pappe Brunhilde Erker, Luis Felipe Segura, Javier Torres Nafarrate (Coord.). 3. ed. México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2006. 294 p.
OST, François. Legal system between order and disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. 192 p.
______; KERCHOVE, M. De la pyramide au reseau: pour une théorie dialectique du droit. Bruxelles: Públications des Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, 2002. 587 p.
POSNER, Eric A.; YOO, John C. Judicial independence in international tribunals. California Law Review, v. 93, n. 1, p. 01 - 74. 2005.
SCHAUER, Frederick. The politics and incentives of legal transplantation. CID Working Paper n. 44, Law and Development Paper n. 2, p. 01 - 22. 2000.
SCOBBIE, Iain. Wicked heresies or legitimate perspectives? Theory and international law. In: EVANS, Malcolm D. (coord.). International law. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 58 - 92.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A liberal theory of international law. American Society of International Law Proceedings, v. 94, p. 240 - 248. 2000.
______. International law in a world of liberal states. European Journal of International Law, v. 6, n. 4, p. 503 - 538. 1995.
TEUBNER, G. Altera pars audiatur: law in the collision of discourses. In: R. Rawlings (ed.) Law, society and economy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997a. p. 149 - 176.
______. And if I by beelzebub cast out devils: an essay on the diabolics of network failure. German Law Journal, v. 10, n. 4, p. 115 - 136. 2009.
______. Constitutional fragments: societal constitutionalism and globalization. Trad. Gareth Norbury. Oxford: OUP, 2012. 213 p.
______. Global Bukowina: legal pluralism in the world society. In: ______. Global law without a state. Brookfield: Dartmouth, 1997b. p. 01 - 22.
______. The King's many bodies: the self-descontruction of law's hierarchy. Law and Society Review, v. 31, n. 4, p. 763 - 787. 1997c.
TRIEPEL, H. Les rapports entre le droit interne et le droit international. Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, v. 1, p. 77 - 121, 1923.
VALDERRAMA, I. J. M. Legal transplants and comparative law. Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional, n. 2, p. 261 - 276. 2003.
VARELLA, M. D. Dificuldades de implementação das decisões da OMC: um estudo de caso a partir do contencioso pneus. Revista Direito GV, v. 19, n. 1, p. 53 - 68. 2014.
______. Internacionalização do direito. Brasília: UniCEUB, 2013. 500 p.
VERDROSS, Alfred. Le fondement du droit international. Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, v. 16, p. 247 - 323, 1927.
WOLFRUM, Rüdiger. Means of ensuring compliance with and enforcement of international environmental law. Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, v. 272, p. 09 - 154, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The submission of articles for publication in the Law, State, and Society Journal(Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade) implies the agreement of the authors with the following terms:
1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in an issue of the journal;
2. The author(s) assure that the submitted text is original and unpublished and that it is not under evaluation process in other journals;
3. The author(s) assume full responsibility for the opinions, ideas, and concepts sustained in the texts;
4. The author(s) grant the editors the right to make textual adjustments and adjustments to the journal's publication standards;
5. Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed, as long as the source is explicitly cited.
