Global justice theory as alternative to the Rawlsian theory of justice in contexts of multiple domination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17808/des.58.1152Keywords:
theories of justice, global justice, distributive justice, cosmopolitanism, inequalityAbstract
In the current multifaceted context, there are actors who benefit from global structural design while others are being imposed barriers to access wealth - which, it is argued, if there was a global distributional architecture focused on fairness, could be better allocated so as to benefit a larger number of individuals. In this matter, mainly using bibliographical research, the paper has the objective to demonstrate that the Rawlsian view, although applicable to hermetic societies, is inadequate for a world submerged in economic inequalities highly tainted by the form of historical, predatory and usurpatory accumulation imposed by the more economically developed countries in relation to the global poor. Therefore, this paper seeks to demonstrate, by an overall analysis and with the scope of the global justice theory as explained by Thomas Pogge, the way in which the global structuring selectively harms, still today, - namely, specially through international resources and loans privileges -, countries, keeping them - or, more often, their populations - in poverty.References
APPIO, Eduardo. Apresentação. In: GARGARELLA, Roberto. As teorias da justiça depois de Rawls: um breve manual de filosofia política. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2008.
BARRETTO, Vicente de Paulo; BRAGATO, Fernanda Frizzo. Leituras de filosofia do direito. Curitiba: Juruá, 2013.
BEITZ, Charles R. Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
BERNSTEIN, Alyssa R. Law of Peoples. In: CHATTERJEE, Deen K. (Org.). Encyclopedia of global justice. New York: Springer, 2011, pp. 635-639.
BROCK, Gillian. Global justice: a cosmopolitan account. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
BROCK, Gillian. Global justice. In: ZALTA, Edward. (Org.). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, Mar. 06 2015. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-global/>. Acesso em: 17 maio 2015.
BUCHANAN, Allen; GOLOVE, David. Philosophy of international law. In: COLEMAN, Jules; SHAPIRO, Scott. (Org.). The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence & philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 868-934.
CHUNG, Young-Iob. South Korea in the fast lane: economic development and capital formation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.
FANON, Frantz. Les damnés de la terre. Paris: La Découverte, 2002.
FORST, Rainer. Justice, morality and power in the global context. In: POGGE, Thomas. FOLLESDAL, Andreas. (Org.). Real world justice: grounds, principles, human rights and social institutions. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, pp. 27-36.
FORST, Rainer. The right to justification: elements of a constructivism theory of justice. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
FRASER, Nancy. Escalas de justicia. Barcelona: Herder, 2008.
FRASER, Nancy. Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.
HÖFFE, Otfried. La justicia en un mundo globalizado. Santiago: Escuela de Gobierno Universidad Adolfo Ibãnez, 2010.
HUMAN Rights Watch (HRW). Well oiled: oil and human rights in Equatorial Guinea. 2009. Disponível em: <http://tinyurl.com/j5gxbp9>. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2016.
JAGGAR, Alisson. (Ed.). Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2010. 272 p.
KANT, Immanuel. À paz perpétua. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 2011.
KLEINGELD, Pauline; BROWN, Eric. Cosmopolitanism. In: ZALTA, Edward. (Org.). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, Dec. 21 2019. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/>. Acesso em: 03 set 2020.
LADWIG, Bernd. Global social justice: whose justice? Whose responsibility? In: MERLE, Jean-Christophe. (Org.). Spheres of global justice. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 445-456.
LANDESMAN, Bruce M. Global justice. In: CHATTERJEE, Deen K. (Org.). Encyclopedia of Global Justice. New York: Springer, 2011, pp. 421-424.
MATTEI, Ugo; NADER, Laura. Plunder: when the rule of law is illegal. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2008.
POGGE, Thomas. World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.
POGGE, Thomas. "Assisting the global poor". In: CHATTERJEE, Deen K. The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004a. Disponível em: <http://tinyurl.com/zzsudzo>. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2017.
POGGE, Thomas. Real world justice. In: BROCK, Gillian; MOELLENDORF, Darrel. (Org.). Current debates on global justice. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005b, pp. 29-53.
POGGE, Thomas. Politics as usual: what lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Sttaford: Polity, 2010.
RAWLS, John. Uma teoria da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1997.
RAWLS, John. A theory of justice: revised edition. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999a.
RAWLS, John. Law of peoples and the idea of public reason revisited. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999b.
RAWLS, John. O direito dos povos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001a.
SINGER, Peter. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, [S.l.], v. 01, n. 1, pp. 229-243, 1972. Disponível em: <http://tinyurl.com/3nc66e>. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2020.
SUNDIATA, Ibrahim K. Equatorial Guinea: colonialism, state terror and the search for stability. Boulder: Westview Press, 1990.
SUPIOT, Alain. Homo Juridicus: ensaio sobre a função antropológica do Direito. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The submission of articles for publication in the Law, State, and Society Journal(Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade) implies the agreement of the authors with the following terms:
1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in an issue of the journal;
2. The author(s) assure that the submitted text is original and unpublished and that it is not under evaluation process in other journals;
3. The author(s) assume full responsibility for the opinions, ideas, and concepts sustained in the texts;
4. The author(s) grant the editors the right to make textual adjustments and adjustments to the journal's publication standards;
5. Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed, as long as the source is explicitly cited.
