Accountability, transparency and asymmetry of virtual visibility relations: analysis of the antidemocratic aspects of the new information and communication technologies from the idea of filter bubble
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17808/des.53.886Keywords:
Big data, filter bubble, digital enclosure, democracy, pluralismAbstract
This paper aims to analyze the negative effects of the use of big data algorithms on the extreme personalization of online activities. To do so, it makes some assumptions based on Norberto Bobbio's concept of democracy. Then, it analyses the problem using the theoretical framework developed by surveillance studies, a group of scholars started by Canadian social scientists. Using both concepts of filter bubble and digital enclosure, it shows that new information and communications technologies (ICTs) are a way to express power that aren't subject to democratic control or oversight. Given this scenario, it argues that the algorithms used in personalization of online activities diminish interactions between different ideas, which is a keystone both for political pluralism and democracy. It conclusion shows that a democratic approach of ICTs is needed in order to preserve democracy and human rights. The adopted methodology was basic research, since it discusses the problem in an analytical method creating an exploratory validity for its theoretical. It is also an exploratory re-search since it tries to develop and clarify key ideas by using bibliographic research.
References
ANDREJEVIC, M. iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007. 325 p.
BARANIUK, C. 'Quit Google, Facebook' suggests tech expert as surveillance scandal deepens. Wired, London, 10 jun. 2013. Disponível em: < http://www.wired.co.uk/article/tim-wu-google-boycott >. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2017.
BOBBIO, N. O futuro da democracia. Tradução de Marco Aurélio Nogueira. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1997. 171 p..
______, N. As ideologias e o poder em crise. Tradução de João Ferreira. 4. ed. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 1999. 240 p.
______, Norberto. La crisis de la democracia y la lección de los clásicos. In: BOBBIO, Norberto; PONTARA, Giuliano; VECA, Salvatore. Crisis de la democracia. Tradução de Jordi Marfà. Barcelona: Ariel, 1985. p. 5-25.
BRIGHENTI, A. M. Democracy and its visibilities. In: HAGGERTY, K.; SAMATAS, M. Surveillance and democracy. London: Routledge, 2010. p. 51-68.
CALHOUN, C. Rethinking the Public Sphere. Presentation to the Ford Foundation. Social Science Research Council, 07 fev 2005. Disponivel em: < http://eliasjacob.com.br/tese/rethinking_the_public_sphere_05_speech.pdf >. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2017.
CARAN, A. Instagram will start showing posts out of order, like Facebook. [s.l.], London, 15 mar. 2016. Disponível em: < https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/15/11241184/instagram-new-feed-sort-algorithm >. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2017.
CASTELLS, M. The power of identity: The information age - economy, society and culture. 2. ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, v. 2, 2010a. 538 p.
DAHL, R. Polyarchy, Pluralism, and Scale. Scandinavian Political Studies, [S.l], 7, n. 4, 1984. 225-240.
DAHL, R. A democracia e seus críticos. Tradução de Patrícia de Freitas Ribeiro. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2012. 625 p..
DELEUZE, G. Post-scriptum sobre as sociedades de controle. In: DELEUZE, G. Conversações. Tradução de Peter Pál Pelbart. São Paulo: 34, 1992. p. 219-226.
HAGGERTY, K. D.; SAMATAS, M. Surveillance and democracy: an unsettled relationship. In: HAGGERTY, K. D.; SAMATAS, M. Surveillance and Democracu. New York: Routledge, 2010. p. 1-16.
HORLING, B.; KULICK, M. Personalized Search for everyone. Google Official Blog, Mountain View, 04 dez. 2009. Disponível em: < https://googleblog.blogspot.com.br/2009/12/personalized-search-for-everyone.html >. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2017.
JOHNSON, D.; WAYLAND, K. Surveillance and transparency as sociotechnical systems of accountability. In: HAGGERTY, K.; SAMATAS, M. Surveillance and democracy. London: Routledge, 2010. p. 19-33.
LEAL, A. Facebook desbloqueia foto de índios botocudos. EBC, Brasília, 17 abr. 2015. Disponível em: < http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/cultura/noticia/2015-04/facebook-desbloqueia-foto-de-indios-botocudos >. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2017.
NICKERSON, D; ROGERS, T. Political Campaigns and Big Data. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series (RWP13-045), 14 nov. 2013. Disponível em: < https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/todd_rogers/files/political_campaigns_and_big_data_0.pdf >. Acesso em: 04 jul. 2017.
PÉREZ LUÑO, A. E. ¿Ciberciudadaní@ o ciudadaní@.com? Barcelona: Gedisa, 2003. 142 p.
______, A. E. Los derechos humanos en la sociedad tecnológica. Madrid: Editorial Universitas, 2012. 140 p..
PARISER, E. The filter bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York: The Penguin Press, 2011. 294 p.
PASQUALE, F. The black box society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015. 311 p.
QUEROL, R. Zygmunt Bauman: "As redes sociais são uma armadilha". El País, Madrid, 09 jan. 2016. Disponível em: < https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2015/12/30/cultura/1451504427_675885.html?id_externo_rsoc=FB_CC >. Acesso em: 04 maio 2016.
RAWLS, J. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. 464 p..
SUNSTEIN, C. R. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 273 p..
______, C. R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. 251 p..
SULLIVAN, A. More Americans see man who leaked NSA secrets as 'patriot' than traitor - poll. Reuters, London, 13 jun. 2013. Disponível em: < http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-security-poll-idUKBRE95B15H20130612 >. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2017.
TEUBNER, G. Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-centred Constitutional Theory. Storrs Lectures 2003/04 Yale Law School, [s.l], p. 24, 2004. Disponível em: < https://www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/42852793/societal_constitutionalism.pdf >. Acesso em: 05 jun. 2017.
WEBER, M. Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva. Tradução de Regis Barbosa e Karen Elsabe Barbosa. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, v. 2, 1999. 586 p.
WHITSON, J. R. Surveillance and democracy in the digital enclosure. In: HAGGERTY, K.; SAMATAS, M. Surveillance and democracy. London: Routledge, 2010. p. 231-246.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The submission of articles for publication in the Law, State, and Society Journal(Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade) implies the agreement of the authors with the following terms:
1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in an issue of the journal;
2. The author(s) assure that the submitted text is original and unpublished and that it is not under evaluation process in other journals;
3. The author(s) assume full responsibility for the opinions, ideas, and concepts sustained in the texts;
4. The author(s) grant the editors the right to make textual adjustments and adjustments to the journal's publication standards;
5. Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed, as long as the source is explicitly cited.