The regulatory obstacles arising from the positivist conception of copyright to access to knowledge

Authors

  • Rogerio Barros Sganzerla UNIRIO, UFF
  • Thiago Bottino FGV Direito Rio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17808/des.53.560

Keywords:

Positivism, Regulation, Information Society, Knowledge.

Abstract

The access to knowledge in Brazil was built within a positivist system and looked for the protection of the "physical" work. Within this context, the present work questions the extent the effectiveness of the current model of the Brazilian Copyright Law, as well as analyzes possi-ble obstacles, their causes and possible alternatives for its improvement. Therefore, the intention it to demonstrate that there is an essential and fundamental problem in the treatment of the issue, that is, the reaffirmation of a positivist dialogue, which prevents certain advances to the topic. Thus, all this analysis about the alternation of paradigms from the physical to the digital environment reflects the emergence of the information society. Although the physical copy has not been abolished, the rise of the digital copy demonstrates that power has altered the world currency. Hold infor-mation has become the focal point for power and regulation of access to knowledge. Based on this, the proposal of this paper it to question the regulations presented on the Brazilian Copyright Law that blocks the access to knowledge based on a system whose justification for protection found several barriers in the digital world.

Author Biography

Rogerio Barros Sganzerla, UNIRIO, UFF

http://lattes.cnpq.br/9694706129546974

References

ADJUKIEWICZ, Kazimierz. Problemas e teorias da filosofia. São Paulo: Livraria Editora Ciências Humanas, 1979.

BECCARIA, Cesare. Dos delitos e das penas. Trad. Marcílio Teixeira. Rio de Janeiro: Estácio de Sá, 2002.

BOBBIO, Norberto. O positivismo jurídico. Trad. Mácio Pugliesi. São Paulo: Ícone, 1995.

DINIZ, Maria Helena. Compêndio de introdução à ciência do direito. Saraiva. 2014

FEYERABEND, Paul. Contra o método. São Paulo: UNESP. 2007.

HACKING, Ian. Representar e intervir - Tópicos introdutórios de filosofia da ciência natural. Trad. Pedro Rocha de Oliveira. Rio de Janeiro: EDUERJ. 2012.

HOBBES, Thomas. Leviatã. São Paulo: Martin Claret. 2008.

KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da razão pura. Trad. Manuela Pinto dos Santos e Alexandre Fradique Morujão. 5ª ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. 2001.

KUHN, Thomas S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1998.

LEMGRUBER, Leticia. Controle da criminalidade: mitos e fatos. Revista Think Thank. São Paulo: 2001.

NADER, Paulo. Filosofia do Direito. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2000.

ROUSSEAU, J. J. Contrato social. Rio de Janeiro: RT. 2014.

SANDEL, Michael J. O que o dinheiro não compra: os limites morais do mercado. Trad. Clóvis Marques. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira. 2012.

STRECK, Lenio Luiz. Ciência política e teoria do estado. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2010.

TRUC, Gonzague. História da Filosofia. Trad. Ruy Flores Lopes e Leonel Vallandro. Porto Algre: Globo, 1958.

UCCB. Cape Brenton University. Court Rules French Novelist Plagiarized Gone With The Wind. S.d. Disponível em: http://faculty.uccb.ca/philosophy/115/originality %20page2.htm. Acesso em 24 de julho de 2014.

Published

2019-01-22

How to Cite

Sganzerla, R. B., & Bottino, T. (2019). The regulatory obstacles arising from the positivist conception of copyright to access to knowledge. Revista Direito, Estado E Sociedade, (53). https://doi.org/10.17808/des.53.560

Issue

Section

Articles (Artigos)