Exploring the Pacing Problem

Regulatory challengers in a scenario of frequent technological change

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17808/des.2141

Keywords:

change, technology, regulation, pacing problem

Abstract

This article introduces the "Pacing Problem", the idea that regulatory institutions struggle to keep pace with technological change. The relevance of this topic lies in its limited organized treatment in Brazilian literature, and on its growing importance given the acceleration of technological change, which warrants in-depth study. Drawing from international literature that defines the issue, this work discusses the main regulatory challenges arising from frequent technological change, highlighting unresolved questions that could inspire a structured research agenda on the subject. The text is divided into two parts. The first part presents the characteristics of technological change that make it especially difficult for regulation to keep up, compared to other types of social change. It explains that technological change tends to be highly complex, unpredictable, and increasingly frequent. The second part presents the approaches proposed in the literature to solve the Pacing Problem, emphasizing the need for greater adaptability in regulatory institutions. Finally, the conclusion synthesizes the main remaining questions and suggests directions for future research.

Author Biography

João Pedro Favaretto Salvador, FGV Direito SP

Doutorando em Direito e Desenvolvimento pela FGV Direito SP, agraciado com Bolsa Mario Henrique Simonsen de Ensino e Pesquisa. Mestre em Direito Penal pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo - Largo São Francisco. Professor convidado de metodologia de pesquisa e Direito e Tecnologia na Escola de Formação Pública da Sociedade Brasileira de Direito Público - EFp SBDP. Foi Líder de Projetos no Centro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Inovação (CEPI) da FGV Direito SP entre 2021 e 2024. Desenvolve pesquisa nas áreas de Direito e Tecnologia, Teoria da Legislação e Moderação de Conteúdo da Internet.   Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/9254885978624012

References

ABREU, Jacqueline De Souza. Intermediação da vigilância do Estado no Brasil e proteção de dados entre cooperação, litígios e constrição de agentes privados: histórico, fundamentos e regulação. Revista Brasileira de Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça, v. 20, n. 50, 3 jul. 2024. 10.30899/dfj.v20i50.1498

ALLENBY, Braden R. Governance and Technology Systems: The Challenge of Emerging Technologies. In: MARCHANT, Gary E.; ALLENBY, Braden R.; HERKERT, Joseph R. (ed.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011.

ASKLAND, Andrew. Introduction: Why Law and Ethics Need to Keep Pace with Emerging Technologies. In: MARCHANT, Gary E.; ALLENBY, Braden R.; HERKERT, Joseph R. (ed.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011.

BENNETT MOSES, Lyria. Why Have a Theory of Law and Technological Change? Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, v. 8, n. 2, p. 589, 1 jan. 2007a. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol8/iss2/12

BENNETT MOSES, Lyria. Recurring Dilemmas: The Law’s Race to Keep Up With Technological Change. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2007-21, 11 abr. 2007b. 10.2139/ssrn.979861

BENNETT MOSES, Lyria; ZALNIERIUTE, Monika. Law and Technology in the Dimension of Time. In: RANCHORDÁS, Sofia; ROZNAI, Yaniv; UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN (ed.). Time, law, and change: an interdisciplinary study. Oxford; New York: Hart, 2020.

BROWNSWORD, Roger. Rights, regulation, and the technological revolution. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

CALABRESI, Guido. A Common Law for the Age of Statutes. Harvard University Press, 1982.

VOLPICELLI, Gian. ChatGPT broke the EU plan to regulate AI. POLITICO, 3 mar. 2023. https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-plan-regulate-chatgpt-openai-artificial-intelligence-act/.

COLLINGRIDGE, David. The social control of technology. Repr ed. London: Pinter, 1982.

COMISSÃO EUROPEIA, White Paper on Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust, 2020. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en

CONSELHO DA EUROPA. European Council Meeting (19 outubro de 2017): EUCO 14/17, 2017. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21620/19-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf.

CROOTOF, Rebecca; e ARD, B. J. Structuring Techlaw. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, v. 34, n. 2, spring 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3664124

HART, H. L. A. The concept of law. Third edition ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012.

HERKERT, Joseph R. Ethical Challenges of Emerging Technologies. In: MARCHANT, Gary E.; ALLENBY, Braden R.; HERKERT, Joseph R. (ed.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011.

JEFFS, James. Autonomous Car Industry in 2024: Sensors, Software and Safety. EE Times Europe., 14 jun. 2024. https://www.eetimes.eu/the-autonomous-car-industry-in-2024-sensors-software-and-safety/

KAAL, Wulf A. Dynamic Regulation for Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 27 ago. 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2831040

MARCHANT, Gary E. The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and the Law. In: MARCHANT, Gary E.; ALLENBY, Braden R.; HERKERT, Joseph R. (ed.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011a.

MARCHANT, Gary E. Adressing the Pacing Problem. In: MARCHANT, Gary E.; ALLENBY, Braden R.; HERKERT, Joseph R. (ed.). The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011b.

MARCHANT, Gary. Governance of Emerging Technologies as a Wicked Problem. Vanderbilt Law Review, v. 73, n. 6, p. 1861, 1 dez. 2020. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol73/iss6/8

MIN, Jungwon. Near-lies in the era of advanced technology: Anticipation and uncertainty. Technology in Society, v. 79, p. 102702, dez. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102702

MOORE, Gordon E. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, v. 38, n. 8, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.1998.658762

MURRAY, Michael D. Generative AI Art: Copyright Infringement and Fair Use. SMU Science and Technology Law Review, v. 26, n. 2, p. 259, 2023. https://doi.org/10.25172/smustlr.26.2.4

RANCHORDÁS, Sofia; VAN ’T SCHIP, Mattis. Future-Proofing Legislation for the Digital Age. In: RANCHORDÁS, Sofia; ROZNAI, Yaniv; UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN (ed.). Time, law, and change: an interdisciplinary study. Oxford; New York: Hart, 2020.

SCHÖN, Donald A. Technology and Change: The New Heraclitus. New York, NY: Delacorte Press, 1967.

THIERER, Adam D. Governing Emerging Technology in an Age of Policy Fragmentation and Disequilibrium. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4099605

ZAPATERO GÓMEZ, Virgilio. The Art of Legislating. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019.

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Salvador, J. P. F. (2026). Exploring the Pacing Problem: Regulatory challengers in a scenario of frequent technological change. Revista Direito, Estado E Sociedade. https://doi.org/10.17808/des.2141

Issue

Section

Articles (Artigos)