Sentencia Petro Urrego vs Colombia: una reflexión necesaria acerca de la competencia de la Procuraduría General de la Nación para de sancionar servidores públicos de elección popular
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17808/des.2103Abstract
This article analyzes the effects of the Petro Urrego vs. Colombia ruling on the Colombian legal system. It deals especially with the Andean country's attempts to adapt the powers of the Attorney General's Office to the orders given by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and contained in the aforementioned ruling and how its implementation has led to clashes between different authorities such as the Attorney General's Office, the Council of State and the Constitutional Court. Using an analytical-descriptive methodology, it was possible to conclude that the Colombian State must adapt its regulations in accordance with conventional standards to guarantee greater protection of the political rights of elected public servants.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 David Mendieta, l Sánchez Jiménez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The submission of articles for publication in the Law, State, and Society Journal(Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade) implies the agreement of the authors with the following terms:
1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in an issue of the journal;
2. The author(s) assure that the submitted text is original and unpublished and that it is not under evaluation process in other journals;
3. The author(s) assume full responsibility for the opinions, ideas, and concepts sustained in the texts;
4. The author(s) grant the editors the right to make textual adjustments and adjustments to the journal's publication standards;
5. Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed, as long as the source is explicitly cited.
