The ideology of Human Rights: on the semiotics of having rights and the politics of being human

Authors

  • Allan M. Hillani The New School for Social Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17808/des.57.1342

Keywords:

Ideology, Human Rights, Semiotics, Greimas, Rancière

Abstract

In the rights Declarations of the 18th Century, rights are defined as universal and not linked to social status. They are taken to be "self-evident" truths, not an aspiration or a political aim, and everyone is already born with them, regardless of State recognition. However, the aftermath of the liberal revolutions and the history of the following centuries did not cease to contest this claim. In the present paper, my aim is not to present a defense of or an attack on human rights, but rather to understand what they are. In order to do this, however, I believe we should inquire what does "having rights" mean, that is, investigate the semiotics involved in rights discourse. For this reason, I will avoid engaging in the discussions that attempt to find the content or the "foundation" of human rights (be it morality, capability, or an institutional understanding of politics). Instead, I propose to apply the Greimasian semiotic rectangle to the system of signification resulting from the meaning of "having rights", and in doing so, derive the consequences of this application and present the "ideological" role human rights play in the relationship between law and politics.

Author Biography

Allan M. Hillani, The New School for Social Research

Ph.D. candidate in Philosophy at the New School for Social Research.

References

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Standord University Press, 1998.

ARENDT, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harvest Book, 1973.

CORSO, John. "What Does Greimas's Semiotic Square Really Do?". Mosaic. Vo. 47, Issue 1, pp. 69-89, 2014.

DOUZINAS, Costas. The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000.

FEINBERG, Joel. "The Nature and Value of Rights". The Journal of Value Enquiry. Vo. 4, Issue 4, pp. 243-257, 1970.

GREIMAS, Algirdas; RASTIER, François. "The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints". Yale French Studies, n. 41, pp. 86-105, 1968.

GRIFFIN, James. On Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

HUNT, Lynn. Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: Norton, 2007.

JAMESON, Fredric. The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.

_____. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso, 1991.

_____. "Postmodernism and the Market". In: ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. (Ed.). Mapping Ideology. London: Verso, 1994, pp. 278-295.

_____. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge, 2005.

MOÄŒNIK, Ratsko. "Ideology and Fantasy". In: KAPLAN, Ann & SPRINKLER, Michael (Ed.). The Althusserian Legacy. London: Verso, 1993, pp. 139-156.

NUSSBAUM, Martha. "Capabilities and Human Rights". Fordham Law Review. Vo. 66, Issue 2, pp. 273-300, 1997.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. "On the Theory of Ideology (The Politics of Althusser)". Radical Philosophy, n. 7, pp. 1-15, 1974.

_____. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

_____. "Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man?". In: RANCIÈRE, Jacques (Ed. by Stephen Corcoran). Dissenssus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2010, pp. 62-75.

_____ "Critical Questions on the Theory of Recognition". In: RANCIÈRE, Jacques & HONNETH, Axel (ed. by Katia Genel & Jean-Phillipe Deranty). Recognition or Disagreement: A Critical Encounter on the Politics of Freedom, Equality, and Identity. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016, pp. 83-95.

RAWLS, John. The Law of the Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Pres, 1999.

RAZ, Joseph. "Human Rights Without Foundations". In: BESSON, Samantha & TASIOULAS, John (Ed.). The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 321-337.

SARAMAGO, José. Seeing. San Diego: Harvest Book, 2007.

SEN, Amartya. "Human Rights and Capabilities". Journal of Human Development. Vo. 6, Issue 2, pp. 151-166, 2005.

TASIOULAS, John. "Towards a Philosophy of Human Rights". Current Legal Problems, n. 65, p. 1-30, 2012.

WALDRON, Jeremy (Ed.). "Nonsense upon stilts": Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man. London: Methuen, 1987.

ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso, 1989.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-18

How to Cite

Hillani, A. M. (2020). The ideology of Human Rights: on the semiotics of having rights and the politics of being human. Revista Direito, Estado E Sociedade, (57). https://doi.org/10.17808/des.57.1342

Issue

No. 57 (2020)

Section

Articles (Artigos)

License

The submission of articles for publication in the Law, State, and Society Journal(Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade) implies the agreement of the authors with the following terms:


1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in an issue of the journal;


2. The author(s) assure that the submitted text is original and unpublished and that it is not under evaluation process in other journals;


3. The author(s) assume full responsibility for the opinions, ideas, and concepts sustained in the texts;


4. The author(s) grant the editors the right to make textual adjustments and adjustments to the journal's publication standards;


5. Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed, as long as the source is explicitly cited.